The "D" Spot Redeux is not a political blog per se, but occasionally I feel I must speak up and speak out forcefully about issues about which I feel strongly.
So please allow me this second "op-ed" post of the week.
So please allow me this second "op-ed" post of the week.
There is a primary election coming up in Detroit on Tuesday, August 5 2008. Several local positions and state legislature and congressional seats are on the ballot. Although the turnout is expected to be embarrassingly low (less than 20%), the election is very important. In recent Detroit history, the Democrat who wins the August primary is the all-but-official winner in the November general election.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16157/16157d7c7df69d0b0b6e035ad12eccd9aa153f5a" alt=""
However, there is one challenger to Ms. Kilpatrick who is basing almost her entire campaign on conducting a smear campaign against the Congresswoman because of the alleged misconduct of her son. This challenger is currently running a distasteful TV commercial mocking the Congresswoman for her support of her son. The point of this challenger's campaign, as well as the TV ad, is to paint Congresswoman Kilpatrick with the same brush as her son. This challenger does not even seem to understand the ramifications of removing someone from such powerful apppointments; especially for Michigan...we need all of the financial help we can get from Congress. New members of Congress are routinely assigned to much less powerful committees; and it takes years to "move up the ladder". There is no way this challenger can even begin to have the influence that Ms. Kilpatrick has worked so hard to achieve over the years.
Although this post is not an official endorsement of Congresswoman Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, it is a denouncement of the tactics of one of her challengers. Back in the spring of 2008, when the mainstream media tainted the name and reputation of Reverend Jeremiah Wright of Chicago based on a 30-second clip of one of his sermons, then tried to condemn Senator Barack Obama just because Rev. Wright was his former pastor, many Democrats (especially those supporting the candidacy of Senator Obama), as well as other fair-minded people, cried "foul". It was patently unfair to transfer the alleged "transgressions" of Rev. Wright to Senator Obama.
In the same vein, I believe it is patently unfair to try to destroy the Congressional career of Congresswoman Kilpatrick based on the actions of her son. On the one hand, a mother is expected to support her son; and at the time of the plaintive cry for support that is part of that commercial (OK, I admit the rant was a little "ghetto"), the Mayor had not been involved in, or accused of the things he is now. On the other hand, the Mayor is a grown man, and as such, the Congresswoman cannot be held accountable for the alleged actions of her son even as she supports him as her son and the father of her grandchildren.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fc09/1fc099574b77d1c60d1422652f4706c8d3fb201c" alt=""
This is cross-posted at my husband's blog: The "D" Spot
If you enjoyed this post, please share it and subscribe to updates!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments! Your email address will not be shown or shared!
Due to overwhelming spam comments, this comment forum will now be moderated. No more "anonymous" comments will be allowed.